| THE EXPENSIVE STATUS QUO
Continuing the current maintenance effort will be expensive for all parties and will not improve water quality or aquatic habitat impairments. Maintaining and operating the Navigation channel in its present format can be expected to cost, over the next 20 years:
Dredging $40,000,000 by Corps of Engineers at $2,000,000 per Year.
Contaminated Disposal Facility $75,000,000 based on 2005 Cleveland Lakefront Plan
Local Share- $26,250,000
Corps Share-$48,750,000
Shoreline replacement $90,000,000 +/- Private land owners
Total 20-year costs: $205,000,000 +/-
Because of the current configuration in armored shoreline, channel depth and absence of functional riparian edge, the ship channel negatively impacts water quality and provides a very hostile habitat for larval fish due to higher temperatures, periods of lower dissolved oxygen levels and lack of food and shelter.
Over the past 16 years the Cuyahoga River RAP and our partners at Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, Ohio EPA and the Corps of Engineers have studied the ship channel extensively. The channel in its current configuration is a source of impairment to the Cuyahoga River, and in turn a contributor to the degradation of Lake Erie. The shape, flow rate and shoreline conditions are direct impairments. The lack of habitat cover along the armored shoreline, elevated water temperatures, and low dissolved oxygen create hostile environments for migrating larval fish.
While much of the bulk commodity freight activity has remained strong, as the economy of the Cuyahoga Valley changes there has been a decrease in the number of customers relying on the freighter fleet for cargo. The Cuyahoga County Planning Commission is conducting extensive planning efforts regarding regenerating the lower Cuyahoga Valley, in an effort known as the Cuyahoga Valley Initiative (CVI). The RAP has been an active partner in this effort.
As the riparian property owners of the aging shoreline contemplate the costs of replacement, many in our community are starting to think long term and consider alternative, more integrated approaches for community management toward the recovery of the river, especially as a re-development asset, in terms of shoreline maintenance, freight movement and associated costs.
In some cases projected bulkhead replacement costs may exceed the value of the river front parcels.
|